India’s cryptocurrency market is being reshaped by two parallel developments. On one side, traders are rapidly shifting from spot purchases to crypto futures, with derivatives now contributing more than 80% of trading volume on several Indian platforms. On the other, enforcement agencies are increasing their scrutiny of digital assets used to move proceeds from online investment and work-from-home scams.

Meanwhile, the Directorate of Enforcement has conducted searches across 19 locations in Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Srinagar in connection with alleged online fraud. The agency said it seized cryptocurrency worth approximately ₹3.35 crore, along with cash and evidence linked to multiple crypto wallets and mule bank accounts.

Why Crypto Futures Now Dominate Indian Trading

Crypto futures are contracts that allow traders to take positions on whether the price of Bitcoin, Ether or another digital asset will rise or fall. Unlike spot trading, purchasing a futures contract does not necessarily involve acquiring or transferring the underlying cryptocurrency.

According to industry estimates reported by Moneycontrol, derivatives now represent more than 80% of the trading volume recorded across Indian crypto platforms. Retail traders are estimated to contribute approximately 70% of this futures activity.

India introduced a 30% tax on income from virtual digital assets in 2022. Applicable VDA transfers also attract a 1% TDS on the transaction value. The deduction can affect an active trader’s available capital because it applies whenever a qualifying transfer occurs, regardless of whether that particular trade generated a profit.

EtherWorld previously explained the foundations of this framework in Cryptocurrency Taxation in India: Things to Keep in Mind. The government retained the same broad structure in the 2026 Budget, as covered in No Tax Relief for Crypto in India’s Budget 2026.

Official figures show that the system is generating substantial tax collections. TDS collected from crypto transactions reached ₹511.83 crore during FY 2024–25, representing a 41% increase over the previous financial year. EtherWorld examined these figures in India’s Crypto TDS Crosses ₹511 Crore in FY25.

However, higher collections do not necessarily mean that the policy is strengthening India’s domestic spot market. Instead, traders appear to be changing the instruments and platforms they use.

Some are moving from spot transactions to domestic derivatives, while others are accessing offshore exchanges offering perpetual futures, lower friction and deeper liquidity. This behaviour reflects a broader policy challenge also discussed in Binance’s India Withdrawal Debate Reignites Crypto Policy Questions.

India has therefore created a situation in which holding and transferring crypto attracts substantial tax friction, while leveraged speculation may be comparatively easier to execute.

Tax Savings Are Pushing Retail Traders Towards Greater Risk

Moving from spot trading to futures can reduce the immediate capital impact of TDS, but it does not make trading safer.

Futures platforms often provide leverage, allowing a trader to control a position larger than the amount deposited as collateral. A user depositing ₹10,000 may, depending on the platform and available leverage, open a position worth several times that amount.

This can amplify gains when the market moves in the trader’s favour. It can also amplify losses and trigger liquidation when the price moves in the opposite direction.

Moneycontrol’s report cited industry estimates suggesting that around 70% to 80% of crypto-derivatives traders lose money. The concern is particularly significant because retail users reportedly account for nearly 70% of India’s futures market.

The movement towards derivatives therefore cannot automatically be described as the maturation of India’s crypto industry. A mature derivatives market normally includes clear leverage limits, suitability assessments, risk disclosures, transparent liquidation policies, surveillance systems and mechanisms for resolving disputes.

India has tax and anti-money laundering obligations for crypto activity, but it has not yet introduced a complete regulatory framework covering crypto futures and perpetual contracts.

This legal uncertainty remains central to India’s broader policy debate. A GNLU report called for clearer rules rather than the current patchwork of taxation, reporting and enforcement requirements. EtherWorld covered its recommendations in India Needs Clear Crypto Rules, Says GNLU Report.

The Reserve Bank of India has also maintained a cautious position on recognising cryptocurrencies within the formal financial system. Its concerns and the questions raised before Parliament’s finance panel were examined in India’s RBI Rejects Crypto Legal Status Before Finance Panel.

The central issue is not whether futures should exist. Derivatives can be useful for hedging, risk management and gaining exposure without direct custody. The problem arises when tax policy indirectly pushes inexperienced retail users from relatively simple spot purchases towards leveraged instruments without equivalent investor protections.

India’s crypto policy may therefore be reducing one form of speculation while unintentionally encouraging another that carries a higher probability of rapid losses.

BREAKING: 🇮🇳 ED raids 19 locations, seizes ₹3.35 crore in crypto in online investment fraud probe. pic.twitter.com/UMTWRn8umf

— Crypto India (@CryptooIndia) July 16, 2026

ED Seizes ₹3.35 Crore in Crypto During Cyber Fraud Investigation

The growth of legitimate crypto trading is unfolding alongside increased criminal use of digital assets.

The Enforcement Directorate’s Chennai Zonal Office conducted searches on July 10 and July 11 at 16 locations in Tamil Nadu, two locations in Kerala and one location in Srinagar. The operation was conducted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in connection with alleged fake-investment and work-from-home scams.

According to the agency, unknown fraudsters allegedly approached victims through fake online investment platforms and fraudulent work-from-home offers. Victims were promised high returns or easy income and were persuaded to transfer money through bank accounts controlled by the accused.

The ED said the scams generated proceeds of approximately ₹14.95 crore.

Investigators allege that the money was first routed through multiple mule bank accounts and shell entities. It was then converted into cryptocurrency and transferred through different wallets to conceal its origin and ownership.

During the searches, authorities seized cryptocurrency worth approximately ₹3.35 crore and cash amounting to ₹14.50 lakh. Several bank accounts associated with the accused and related entities were also frozen.

Digital devices, mobile phones, laptops, bank records, company documents and information connected to cryptocurrency accounts were reportedly recovered.

This case follows several crypto-linked enforcement actions in India. EtherWorld previously reported how authorities uncovered a larger laundering network in India’s ED Exposes ₹285 Crore Crypto Driven Scam.

Another investigation involved fake platforms, peer-to-peer transactions and suspected cross-border movement of funds, as detailed in India’s Multi-State Crypto Crackdown: ED Probes Fake Platforms.

In January, the ED also seized crypto assets while investigating an alleged investment scheme linked to Ether Trade Asia. That case was covered in ED Cracks Down on Ether Trade Asia: Investor Losses Cross ₹4.25 Crore.

These investigations show that cryptocurrency is generally one component of a broader laundering chain rather than the sole mechanism used to commit fraud. Scammers frequently combine social engineering, fake applications, mule accounts, shell entities, payment gateways and cryptocurrency wallets.

The blockchain does not automatically make criminal proceeds invisible. Public transaction records can help investigators trace movements between wallets. However, attribution becomes more difficult when funds pass through numerous addresses, decentralised services, cross-chain bridges, unregistered intermediaries or accounts controlled through stolen identities.

India has consequently expanded blockchain-forensics capabilities among enforcement officials. EtherWorld examined this development in India’s Ministry of Finance Expands Crypto Enforcement Training.

India Needs Regulation That Separates Trading From Financial Crime

The futures boom and the ED investigation highlight two separate issues that are often combined in India’s crypto debate.

The first is market regulation. Indian users continue to trade cryptocurrencies despite the 30% tax, the 1% TDS and the absence of a dedicated digital-asset law. The growth of futures indicates that demand has not disappeared. It has moved towards products that create less immediate tax friction.

The second issue is financial crime. Fraud networks are using cryptocurrency alongside bank accounts and shell entities to receive, convert and move illicit funds. These activities require stronger anti-money laundering controls, faster wallet attribution, coordination between exchanges and enforcement agencies, and better public awareness.

Treating every crypto user as a potential offender would push compliant activity away from visible domestic platforms. At the same time, treating crypto like an ordinary investment product without acknowledging its fraud and custody risks would leave consumers exposed.

India needs a framework that distinguishes between long-term investment, spot trading, leveraged derivatives, payments, custody services and criminal misuse.

The government has already strengthened oversight through FIU registration requirements, tax reporting and enforcement under the PMLA. EtherWorld previously reported the scale of these measures in India Intensifies Crypto Oversight as ED Freezes ₹4,190 Crore and Sends 44,057 Tax Notices.

India’s crypto market has not been eliminated by taxation or regulatory uncertainty. It has adapted. The rise of futures demonstrates how traders respond to incentives, while the ED’s seizures show how investigators are becoming more capable of following illicit funds across bank accounts and blockchain networks.

The next phase of India’s crypto policy must therefore move beyond the question of whether digital assets should be permitted. The more important question is how to keep legitimate activity transparent, protect retail participants and isolate criminal misuse without driving the entire market outside the country’s regulatory reach.

To promote your Web3 articles, events, and projects, you may reach out anytime via EtherWorld PR for submissions and collaboration.

Related Articles

1. India Intensifies Crypto Oversight as ED Freezes ₹4,190 Crore and Sends 44,057 Tax Notices
2. India’s RBI Rejects Crypto Legal Status Before Finance Panel
3. Parliament Finance Panel to Meet RBI Over Crypto Regulations
4. India Needs Clear Crypto Rules, Says GNLU Report
5. What Happens If India Bans Crypto?

To follow blockchain news, track Ethereum protocol progress, and read our latest stories, subscribe to our weekly today.